A. Kovács, C. Esterhuysen, G. Frenking
The Nature
of the Chemical Bond Revisited: An Energy Partitioning Analysis
of Nonpolar
Bonds.
Chemistry - A European Journal, 11 (2005) 1813-1825
The nature of the chemical bond in nonpolar
molecules has been investigated with the help of the energy partitioning
analysis (EPA) of the ADF program using DFT calculations. The EPA divides the
bonding interactions into three major components, i.e. the repulsive Pauli
term, quasi-classical electrostatic interactions and orbital interactions. The latter two
terms are used to define the nature of
the chemical bond. It is shown that nonpolar bonds between main group
elements of the first and higher octal rows of the periodic system which are
prototypical covalent bonds have large attractive contributions by classical
electrostatic interactions, which may even be stronger than the attractive
orbital interactions. Fragments with totally symmetrical electron density
distributions, like the nitrogen atoms in N2, may strongly attract
each other through classical electrostatic forces, which contribute 30.0% of
the total attractive interactions.
The electrostatic attraction can become enhanced by anisotropic charge
distribution of the valence electrons of the atoms that have local areas of
(negative) charge concentration. It is shown that atomic partial charges may be
misleading for analyzing the nature of the interatomic interactions, because
they do not reveal the topography of the electronic charge distribution.
Besides dinitrogen, four groups of molecules have been studied. The attractive
binding interactions in HnE-EHn (E = Li to F; n = 0 - 3)
possess between 20.7 % (E = F) and 58.4% (E = Be) electrostatic character. The
substitution of hydrogen by fluorine does not lead to significant changes in
the nature of the binding interactions in FnE-EFn (E = Be
to O). The electrostatic contributions to the attractive interactions are
between 29.8% (E = O) and 55.3% (E = Be). The fluorine substituents have a
large effect on the Pauli repulsion in the nitrogen and oxygen compounds. This
explains why F2N-NF2 has a much weaker bond than H2N-NH2
while the interaction energy in FO-OF is much stronger than in HO-OH. The
double bonds in the molecules HB=BH, H2C=CH2, HN=NH have
larger contributions from orbital interactions (between 59.9% in B2H2
and 65.4% in N2H2) than the respective single bonds in HnE-EHn.
An even higher degree of the orbital term DEorb (72.4%) is found in the HC≡CH
triple bond. The contribution of DEorb
in HnE=EHn increases and the relative contribution of the
π bonding decreases when E becomes more electronegative. The
π-bonding interactions in HC≡CH amount to 44.4% of the total orbital
interactions. The interaction energy in H3E-EH3 (E = C to Pb) decreases monotonically as
the element E becomes heavier. The
electrostatic contributions to the E-E bond increases from E = C (41.4%) to E =
Sn (55.1%) but then becomes less when E = Pb (51.7%). A true understanding of the strength and
trends of the chemical bonding can only be achieved when the Pauli repulsion is
considered. The repulsive DEPauli
term is in most cases the largest term in the EPA in an absolute sense.